Hello, World!
A friend might describe me as an average student
from an average family living an average life in sunny Southern California.
Yet, from another perspective I am one the happiest, most privileged, wealthy
and well-educated individuals in the world. The many barriers between me
and the rest of the world create an illusion of normalcy, effectively
concealing the relative opulence I live in. Coming to terms with my own
ignorance to the disparity in living conditions in my own backyard
has inspired me to dig deeper into the concept of inequality and
its greater implications.
http://pswlwiffle.webstarts.com/uploads/joes.jpg
After entering college dead-set on becoming a
doctor, a class I took in my first semester opened my eyes to
the potential for impact the field of global health offers. Since then I
have invested my energies into acquiring the tools I believe to be necessary
for impact through studying Global Health and Mathematics/Economics.
Professionally, I am interested in Health Metrics and Evaluation, particularly
in developing settings. I am optimistic about the future, but plagued by
the lingering fear that widespread suffering is intrinsic to human existence.
Incredible economic growth over the past
century drastically improved standards of living though out the
world. Innovations in health and technology completely shift the outlook
for the future of mankind. In spite of this, people die of starvation every
year. Can humanity eradicate the most basic causes of human suffering while
maintaining acceptable standards of living for the rich world? If this is
possible, would the necessary ethical shift diminish incentive for progress at
the frontier of innovation? Is human satisfaction a zero-sum game in which one
man's happiness necessitates another man's suffering? These are questions which
frame my future professional pursuits, and therefore an analytical look at
existing critical thought on this topic is of great interest to me.
While I am by no means an
expert in economics, wealth distribution, or life satisfaction, my
education has provided me with a basic literacy to understand and
synthesize useful information. I hope to focus my passion about these topics
into productive critical thought. I am an optimist and so my posts will
often take a positive viewpoint when possible. Despite this caveat, I am not
afraid of conceding to harsh conclusions given proper justification. The
value of this blog will not be derived from my personal expertise, but
rather from my open-minded approach to a topic of genuine interest to me.
I developed a cursory framework for my future posts which
I hope will give you an idea of whether or not you are interested in the
direction of this blog. First, I would like to look at inequality and resource
distribution from an evolutionary perspective. The history of life on
earth has been a constant competition for limited resources and a
refinement processing rewarding the best survivors with the ultimate prize of
continued existence. By addressing the origins of resource competition, I
hope to highlight our inherent desire to accumulate, sometimes beyond
logic.
http://warpandwoof.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/greed-Donald-Duck.jpg
Later on, I will discuss some of the measures of
inequality and how different countries stack up against each other (now and in
the past). Next, I will highlight some of the political systems which attempt
to address the issue of wealth distribution. I plan to continue on by looking
at how different religious theologies address inequality and the ethical
backing they give to particular responses to privilege. I would then like to
see how levels of inequality affect health and life satisfaction in different
countries. By doing this, I hope to close in on whether or not minimizing
inequality is important for raising overall life satisfaction.
Finally I would like to write about different social
movements like the Occupy movement or the Basic Income Guarantee concept of
redistributing wealth by giving every citizen a check to cover basic life needs.
I believe understanding these ideas provides perspective on what possible steps
forward may be. Furthermore, I hope to forecast whether or not the world is
prepared to make changes for the goodness of all.
By the end of it all, I hope that both my readers and
I have a more informed opinion on whether or not life is a zero-sum game or
rising waters raise all ships. I'm hoping for the latter!
Profile:
Getting a group of academics in the same room
together can be incredibly difficult. With busy class schedules, research, and
personal lives, it is rare that individuals with common interests have free
time to meet up for collaboration and exchange of ideas. While this fact holds
for professors who are at the top of their field, it is especially true for
young researchers who are just beginning to make a name for themselves. Luckily
the internet provides a forum for discussion and opportunity for collaboration
which doesn’t require a major sacrifice in time committed to other aspects of
life. The ability to simply log-in and connect with a discussion sustained by a
collection of like-minded colleagues is an incredible phenomenon that benefits
not only those participating in the discussion, but interested observers as
well.
The blog, “Inequalities: Research and reflectionfrom both sides of the Atlantic,” was started in September 2010 by a group of
young academic researchers who met at a ‘Social Change: a Harvard-Manchester
Initiative’ (SCHMI) workshop in Crewe, England. Their decision to continue
working together after the conference had ended took the form of a
collaborative blog. The fields covered by the collective range between
sociology, political science, geography, demography, social policy, and
economics. They come from “universities on both sides of the Atlantic,” and aim
to provide:
"… a space to critically discuss research on inequality, both our own research and the most interesting research we come across; and… a community of people who want to try and tackle the injustices they see in the world by shedding light on things that would otherwise be invisible."
I am really excited to share this blog, and I think
that the posts will be relevant to all readers who have taken interest in my
writing so far. While the broad base of posters limits the continuity of the
blog as a whole, I welcome the variety as refreshing. I often get caught on a
single track or mindset when it comes to inequality, and reading informed posts
from different points of view serves as a great reminder of the number of
factors which impact this topic.
I’ll share a couple of my favorite posts to set you
off in the right direction and give you an idea of what to expect from
“Inequalities.” A post questioning the purpose of elite universities brings to
light some interesting questions about the goal of higher education. The author
draws an analogy between elite universities and the preparations of a country’s
Olympic program. He highlights how, similar to an Olympic training program, our
elite universities pick out the best and brightest and cultivate them to be the
very best in the world. To go along with the idea of competing countries, each country’s
universities may exist only to produce the best intellects who will compete
intellectually with the innovators of other countries. I appreciate the efforts
the post makes to look at the how the composition of existing institutions may
unintentionally contribute to inequality. The post provides a unique
sociological perspective to a topic which is most often seen through an
economic lens.
http://marshallramsey.com/wp-content/uploads/mathlete2.jpg
Another post I wanted to highlight pulls some
interesting points out of a book called, “Doormen,” by Peter Bearmen. The book
details how a close look at the seemingly minor details surrounding the job of
a doorman reveal interesting aspects about social status and function. The post
provides a succinct summary and guides readers of shorter blog-based material
to more in-depth and thorough reading by highlighting relevant literature.
While this blog is not going to be your front page
for the latest in inequality, it can provided thoughtful and insightful reading
for whenever you want to check-in for an update. I really enjoy learning from
those who are in the trenches at universities, doing the research necessary to
push for evidence-based reform. While there may be some overlap in the content
posted on my blog, I think that “Inequalities” is likely to take a more diverse
and original approach, whereas my blog largely serves as a place for synthesis
of existing material that is on the web. It appears others have found their
blog to be useful as well; according to majesticseo.com, the blog has
accumulated more than 100,000 backlinks in the last 5 years.
Although nothing will beat good old-fashioned
in-person collaboration, one benefit of the transition in academic discourse to
the web is that public documentation allows for amateurs to read and
participate in a way that was previously not possible. It is important to take
advantage. If you are an amateur, read and discuss the content produced by
experts in your field of interest. And if you are one of those experts, share
your knowledge with the rest of the world by engaging in online discourse. The
“Inequalities” blog bridges the gap between amateur and academic, and serves as
a testament to the power of online collaboration.
Voice:
One of my favorite bloggers, Karl Widerquist, writes
in association with the United States Basic Income Guarantee website. His
credentials are substantial: A Ph. D. in Political Theory from Oxford University
and a Ph. D. in Economics from the City University in New York. Dr. Widerquist’s
blog is a space where he partially steps away from the formal writing found in
his books and journal entries, and writes freely about a topic he is passionate
about.
I take personal interest in analyzing the voice that
Karl uses in his posts. To me he represents the rational yet passionate
expression that I would like to have come across in my own writing. On the
whole, I feel convinced and moved by Karl’s writing because he appeals to logic
in an engaging way.
In a post titled, “Conservative website finds USBIGbehind vast government conspiracy,” Widerquist employs a number of techniques
which epitomize the effectiveness of his voice. One of his favorite techniques
is the use of parenthesis to provide qualification to statements.
“Although this is the first time (I know of) that the USBIG website has caught the attention of conspiracy theorists, it is not the first time that BIG has caught their attention.”
Here Widerquist moderates his statement by
acknowledging his potential inaccuracy rather than making his statement
unequivocal. Often times the parenthesis allow him to make a broad and strong statement
that is quickly tempered by an aside in parenthesis. While this weakens the
strength of his arguments on the whole, he gains credibility by not
overstepping what is rationally justified.
Another technique he uses is a repeated simple
sentence structure to display passion in an escalating argument.
“Over the last 30 years or more, the U.S. welfare system has been slowly but consistently dismantled. The minimum wage has not kept pace with inflation. Individuals’ rights to organize unions have been reduced. Taxes on the wealthy have fallen while government favors for the wealthy have increased.”
To me, this repeated sentence structure connotes an
individual speaking to a crowd, getting louder and more expressive, ushering
the audience along to the peak of her argument. A lot of very important
information is contained in these short sentences. If each point were
elaborated upon by Karl, he would run the risk of his readers losing sight of
his overarching point. Instead he lists them off, rapidly and with confidence, maintaining
the readers focus and steadily building to the overall point.
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02329/afp_2329741b.jpg
In another of Karl’s posts titled, “What does theStone Age have to do with us?” he uses rhetorical questions on multiple
occasions to further his own argument while encouraging the reader to think for
themselves about the topic in question. Readers frequently bring entrenched
viewpoints to an article. To get them to even consider an alternative point of
view, one must first get them to question the certainty of their original
belief.
In Winderquist’s article, he wants his readers to
rethink what appears to be a rather obvious statement that modern man is better
off than our hunter-gatherer ancestors. He creates room for discussion on the
topic through rhetorical questions:
“How do we know that property began as private property? Are we sure that every single modern worker is better off than our hunter-gatherer ancestors?”
Rather than immediately making a statement in
conflict with a reader’s intuition, he eases into his argument by simply
raising a question. This voice technique reduces the abrasiveness of topics
that are not predisposed to be well-received by their audience.
Although I don’t agree with all of the arguments
Winderquist makes in his blog, I have immense respect for the voice he uses in
his writing. I hope to incorporate a number of his techniques into my own
writing. I am passionate about a number of divisive issues which require
rational and informed arguments, but also need to keep readers engaged. Finding
a balance between evidence-based argumentation and gripping prose requires
practice and guidance. For me, Karl Winderquist offers an effective style I hope
to emulate in my future writing.
